Asserting Exceptions With JUnit Rules: IsEqual Matcher
In my first post on asserting exceptions with JUint, I showed how to test that a specific type of exception is thrown with expected substrings in the error message. In my second post, I showed how we can write a custom [Matcher] to inspect the contents of the exception. In this post, I’ll show you how to take advantage of the stock IsEqual matcher to accomplish the same task, but with less work.
This Matcher is straightforward - it evaluates whether two objects are equal by calling equals(Object) on one of the objects that isn’t null, passing in the other. So, to use it with our custom exception, we’ll need to make sure that our equals(Object) method correctly evaluates two of its instances.
The equals method for class Object implements the most discriminating possible equivalence relation on objects; that is, for any non-null reference values x and y, this method returns true if and only if x and y refer to the same object (x == y has the value true).
This won’t help us here, because we’ll be comparing exceptions thrown in our code with one we instantiated in our unit test. We’re going to have to implement equals(Object) ourselves.
Here’s my simple custom exception:
You have to be careful when implementing either equals(Object) or hashCode(). The rule is that if you implement either of these methods, then you need to implement both. Two objects that are equal must have the same hash code. If they don’t, and you try to add two distinct, but equal instances of a class to a Map, they’d both be accepted. This is because internally, the Map stores the items in ‘buckets’ based on their hash codes, and then only has to check equality within a bucket. If two objects have different hash codes, then they won’t be compared to each other.
Your IDE should have the ability to generate what we need here. If you’re using Eclipse (I recommend the STS version, right-click in the source file, select “Source”, and the select “Generate hashCode() and equals()”.
After selecting that option, choose which private members will be used in the two methods. I recommend selecting “‘Use blocks in ‘if’ statements” in order to help wrong code look wrong, should someone modify these methods down the road.
Here’s our final ErrorCodeException class with the newly generated code:
Verifying _equals(Object) and hashCode()
Even though we generated this code, we still need to test it. Here’s the test fixture for ErrorCodeException:
Using the IsEqual Matcher In Our Unit Tests
Now that we’ve implemented equals(Object) and hashCode() for our custom exception, we can use the IsEqual Matcher to setup an expectation for a specific exception.
In the first test, I create an IsEqual Matcher with the exception that I want to compare the thrown exception to. No custom Matcher was required, and my custom exception is now more useful because of it.
In my second test, I include the ‘old way’ of checking exceptions to demonstrate how much easier and more readable exception tests are when using JUnit’s Rules feature.